+Consider using @option{--sparse} when performing file system backups,
+to avoid archiving the expanded forms of files stored sparsely in the
+system.
+
+Even if your system has no sparse files currently, some may be
+created in the future. If you use @option{--sparse} while making file
+system backups as a matter of course, you can be assured the archive
+will never take more space on the media than the files take on disk
+(otherwise, archiving a disk filled with sparse files might take
+hundreds of tapes). @xref{Incremental Dumps}.
+
+However, be aware that @option{--sparse} option presents a serious
+drawback. Namely, in order to determine if the file is sparse
+@command{tar} has to read it before trying to archive it, so in total
+the file is read @strong{twice}. So, always bear in mind that the
+time needed to process all files with this option is roughly twice
+the time needed to archive them without it.
+@FIXME{A technical note:
+
+Programs like @command{dump} do not have to read the entire file; by
+examining the file system directly, they can determine in advance
+exactly where the holes are and thus avoid reading through them. The
+only data it need read are the actual allocated data blocks.
+@GNUTAR{} uses a more portable and straightforward
+archiving approach, it would be fairly difficult that it does
+otherwise. Elizabeth Zwicky writes to @file{comp.unix.internals}, on
+1990-12-10:
+
+@quotation
+What I did say is that you cannot tell the difference between a hole and an
+equivalent number of nulls without reading raw blocks. @code{st_blocks} at
+best tells you how many holes there are; it doesn't tell you @emph{where}.
+Just as programs may, conceivably, care what @code{st_blocks} is (care
+to name one that does?), they may also care where the holes are (I have
+no examples of this one either, but it's equally imaginable).
+
+I conclude from this that good archivers are not portable. One can
+arguably conclude that if you want a portable program, you can in good
+conscience restore files with as many holes as possible, since you can't
+get it right.
+@end quotation
+}
+
+@cindex sparse formats, defined
+When using @samp{POSIX} archive format, @GNUTAR{} is able to store
+sparse files using in three distinct ways, called @dfn{sparse
+formats}. A sparse format is identified by its @dfn{number},
+consisting, as usual of two decimal numbers, delimited by a dot. By
+default, format @samp{1.0} is used. If, for some reason, you wish to
+use an earlier format, you can select it using
+@option{--sparse-version} option.
+
+@table @option
+@opindex sparse-version
+@item --sparse-version=@var{version}
+
+Select the format to store sparse files in. Valid @var{version} values
+are: @samp{0.0}, @samp{0.1} and @samp{1.0}. @xref{Sparse Formats},
+for a detailed description of each format.
+@end table
+
+Using @option{--sparse-format} option implies @option{--sparse}.
+
+@node Attributes
+@section Handling File Attributes
+@UNREVISED
+
+When @command{tar} reads files, it updates their access times. To
+avoid this, use the @option{--atime-preserve[=METHOD]} option, which can either
+reset the access time retroactively or avoid changing it in the first
+place.
+
+Handling of file attributes
+
+@table @option
+@opindex atime-preserve
+@item --atime-preserve
+@itemx --atime-preserve=replace
+@itemx --atime-preserve=system
+Preserve the access times of files that are read. This works only for
+files that you own, unless you have superuser privileges.
+
+@option{--atime-preserve=replace} works on most systems, but it also
+restores the data modification time and updates the status change
+time. Hence it doesn't interact with incremental dumps nicely
+(@pxref{Incremental Dumps}), and it can set access or data modification times
+incorrectly if other programs access the file while @command{tar} is
+running.
+
+@option{--atime-preserve=system} avoids changing the access time in
+the first place, if the operating system supports this.
+Unfortunately, this may or may not work on any given operating system
+or file system. If @command{tar} knows for sure it won't work, it
+complains right away.
+
+Currently @option{--atime-preserve} with no operand defaults to
+@option{--atime-preserve=replace}, but this is intended to change to
+@option{--atime-preserve=system} when the latter is better-supported.
+
+@opindex touch
+@item -m
+@itemx --touch
+Do not extract data modification time.
+
+When this option is used, @command{tar} leaves the data modification times
+of the files it extracts as the times when the files were extracted,
+instead of setting it to the times recorded in the archive.
+
+This option is meaningless with @option{--list} (@option{-t}).
+
+@opindex same-owner
+@item --same-owner
+Create extracted files with the same ownership they have in the
+archive.
+
+This is the default behavior for the superuser,
+so this option is meaningful only for non-root users, when @command{tar}
+is executed on those systems able to give files away. This is
+considered as a security flaw by many people, at least because it
+makes quite difficult to correctly account users for the disk space
+they occupy. Also, the @code{suid} or @code{sgid} attributes of
+files are easily and silently lost when files are given away.
+
+When writing an archive, @command{tar} writes the user @acronym{ID} and user name
+separately. If it can't find a user name (because the user @acronym{ID} is not
+in @file{/etc/passwd}), then it does not write one. When restoring,
+it tries to look the name (if one was written) up in
+@file{/etc/passwd}. If it fails, then it uses the user @acronym{ID} stored in
+the archive instead.
+
+@opindex no-same-owner
+@item --no-same-owner
+@itemx -o
+Do not attempt to restore ownership when extracting. This is the
+default behavior for ordinary users, so this option has an effect
+only for the superuser.
+
+@opindex numeric-owner
+@item --numeric-owner
+The @option{--numeric-owner} option allows (ANSI) archives to be written
+without user/group name information or such information to be ignored
+when extracting. It effectively disables the generation and/or use
+of user/group name information. This option forces extraction using
+the numeric ids from the archive, ignoring the names.
+
+This is useful in certain circumstances, when restoring a backup from
+an emergency floppy with different passwd/group files for example.
+It is otherwise impossible to extract files with the right ownerships
+if the password file in use during the extraction does not match the
+one belonging to the file system(s) being extracted. This occurs,
+for example, if you are restoring your files after a major crash and
+had booted from an emergency floppy with no password file or put your
+disk into another machine to do the restore.
+
+The numeric ids are @emph{always} saved into @command{tar} archives.
+The identifying names are added at create time when provided by the
+system, unless @option{--old-archive} (@option{-o}) is used. Numeric ids could be
+used when moving archives between a collection of machines using
+a centralized management for attribution of numeric ids to users
+and groups. This is often made through using the NIS capabilities.
+
+When making a @command{tar} file for distribution to other sites, it
+is sometimes cleaner to use a single owner for all files in the
+distribution, and nicer to specify the write permission bits of the
+files as stored in the archive independently of their actual value on
+the file system. The way to prepare a clean distribution is usually
+to have some Makefile rule creating a directory, copying all needed
+files in that directory, then setting ownership and permissions as
+wanted (there are a lot of possible schemes), and only then making a
+@command{tar} archive out of this directory, before cleaning
+everything out. Of course, we could add a lot of options to
+@GNUTAR{} for fine tuning permissions and ownership.
+This is not the good way, I think. @GNUTAR{} is
+already crowded with options and moreover, the approach just explained
+gives you a great deal of control already.
+
+@xopindex{same-permissions, short description}
+@xopindex{preserve-permissions, short description}
+@item -p
+@itemx --same-permissions
+@itemx --preserve-permissions
+Extract all protection information.
+
+This option causes @command{tar} to set the modes (access permissions) of
+extracted files exactly as recorded in the archive. If this option
+is not used, the current @code{umask} setting limits the permissions
+on extracted files. This option is by default enabled when
+@command{tar} is executed by a superuser.
+
+
+This option is meaningless with @option{--list} (@option{-t}).
+
+@opindex preserve
+@item --preserve
+Same as both @option{--same-permissions} and @option{--same-order}.
+
+This option is deprecated, and will be removed in @GNUTAR{} version 1.23.
+
+@end table
+
+@node Portability
+@section Making @command{tar} Archives More Portable
+
+Creating a @command{tar} archive on a particular system that is meant to be
+useful later on many other machines and with other versions of @command{tar}
+is more challenging than you might think. @command{tar} archive formats
+have been evolving since the first versions of Unix. Many such formats
+are around, and are not always compatible with each other. This section
+discusses a few problems, and gives some advice about making @command{tar}
+archives more portable.
+
+One golden rule is simplicity. For example, limit your @command{tar}
+archives to contain only regular files and directories, avoiding
+other kind of special files. Do not attempt to save sparse files or
+contiguous files as such. Let's discuss a few more problems, in turn.
+
+@FIXME{Discuss GNU extensions (incremental backups, multi-volume
+archives and archive labels) in GNU and PAX formats.}
+
+@menu
+* Portable Names:: Portable Names
+* dereference:: Symbolic Links
+* hard links:: Hard Links
+* old:: Old V7 Archives
+* ustar:: Ustar Archives
+* gnu:: GNU and old GNU format archives.
+* posix:: @acronym{POSIX} archives
+* Checksumming:: Checksumming Problems
+* Large or Negative Values:: Large files, negative time stamps, etc.
+* Other Tars:: How to Extract GNU-Specific Data Using
+ Other @command{tar} Implementations
+@end menu
+
+@node Portable Names
+@subsection Portable Names
+
+Use portable file and member names. A name is portable if it contains
+only @acronym{ASCII} letters and digits, @samp{/}, @samp{.}, @samp{_}, and
+@samp{-}; it cannot be empty, start with @samp{-} or @samp{//}, or
+contain @samp{/-}. Avoid deep directory nesting. For portability to
+old Unix hosts, limit your file name components to 14 characters or
+less.
+
+If you intend to have your @command{tar} archives to be read under
+MSDOS, you should not rely on case distinction for file names, and you
+might use the @acronym{GNU} @command{doschk} program for helping you
+further diagnosing illegal MSDOS names, which are even more limited
+than System V's.
+
+@node dereference
+@subsection Symbolic Links
+@cindex File names, using symbolic links
+@cindex Symbolic link as file name