From bdf1662af23289fd5674252f6caaf63728a186c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dana Jansens Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 00:54:47 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] clarify using stacking_lower for restoring the stacking order --- openbox/client.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/openbox/client.c b/openbox/client.c index b1655eee..c5d1daa6 100644 --- a/openbox/client.c +++ b/openbox/client.c @@ -123,7 +123,10 @@ void client_manage_all() } XFree(children); - /* stack them as they were on startup! */ + /* stack them as they were on startup! + why with stacking_lower? Why, because then windows who aren't in the + stacking list are on the top where you can see them instead of buried + at the bottom! */ for (i = client_startup_stack_size; i > 0; --i) { Client *c; -- 2.45.2